A Unified View of Propositional Knowledge Base Updates
نویسندگان
چکیده
The semantics of revising knowledge bases represented by sets of propositional sentences is analyzed from a model-theoretic point of view. A characterization of all revision schemes that satisfy the Gardenfors rationality postulates is given in terms of an ordering among interpretations. Properties of the contraction operator that can be defined in terms of revision are also studied. Two new update operators, elimination and recovery, are introduced. Elimination discards all previous preconceptions on a set of propositional letters; recovery undoes the effect of the last update. It is shown that elimination cannot be expressed as a contraction, and that recovery is in general impossible. The existence of an invariant part of the knowledge base comprising a set of integrity constraints is considered and the definition of revision and contraction are modified to take integrity constraints into account.
منابع مشابه
On Propositional Knowledge Base Updates
It is well known that the minimal change principle was widely used in propositional knowledge base updates. However, recent research has shown that under some circumstances, the conventional minimal change methods were inappropriate for updating knowledge bases with disjunctive eeects. In this paper we propose a new method for the knowledge base update based on a persistence principle, which pr...
متن کاملUpdating Knowledge Bases with Disjunctive Information
It is well known that the minimal change principle was widely used in knowledge base updates. However, recent research has shown that the conventional minimal change methods, eg. the PMA 11], were generally problematic for updating knowledge bases with disjunctive information. In this paper, we propose two diierent approaches to deal with this problem { one is called the minimal change with exc...
متن کاملPropositional Knowledge Bases Merging
This paper concentrates on merging knowledge repositories representing different viewpoints, with all of them subject to updates and revisions. A set of criteria of interest is defined. On the basis, different approaches are reviewed, which are assessed with respect to these criteria.
متن کاملDisjunctive Update, Minimal Change, and Default Reasoning
It is well known that the minimal change principle was widely used in knowledge base updates. However, recent research has shown that conventional minimal change methods, eg. the PMA 9], are generally problematic for updating knowledge bases with disjunctive information under some circumstances. In this paper, we propose a new approach, which is called the minimal change with exceptions (the MC...
متن کاملThe Probabilistic Logic of Communication and Change
This paper introduces a Probabilistic Logic of Communication and Change, which captures in a unified framework subjective probability, arbitrary levels of mutual knowledge and a mechanism for multi-agent Bayesian updates that can model complex social-epistemic scenarios, such as informational cascades. We show soundness, completeness and decidability of our logic, and apply it to a concrete exa...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1989